Skip to main content
Malta · Reviewed October 2026

What Is Data Protection Act, Chapter 586?

Malta’s Data Protection Act, Chapter 586, was enacted through Act XX of 2018 and commenced on 28 May 2018, repealing and replacing Chapter 440. GDPR applies directly, while Chapter 586 and subsidiary legislation supply institutional rules, national choices, restrictions, derogations, and sector-specific provisions. The identified amendments are Act XII of 2021 and Legal Notice 212 of 2023; the latter substituted references to the Attorney General with references to the State Advocate and was not a substantive GDPR-rights amendment. Malta’s Section 9 expression derogation is notably granular. It applies to specified GDPR sub-paragraphs rather than whole articles, including only Articles 13(1)-(3), 14(1)-(4), 15(1)-(3), 17(1)-(2), 18(1)(a), (b), and (d), 20(1)-(2), and 21(1). Articles not listed remain subject to GDPR, and the derogation requires incompatibility with the expression purpose, necessity, proportionality, and substantial public interest. No Malta-specific data-broker complaint, deletion, opt-out, or public-record-specific deletion route was located. The identified routes are ordinary GDPR rights against the relevant controller and the general IDPC complaint process. IDPC’s current complaint guidance directs individuals to its online form, requires supporting documentation and the controller’s details, and does not accept anonymous complaints.

Rahul Kandoriya
Written byRahul Kandoriya·Founder, OfflistMe·Last updated October 12, 2026

At a glance

Full name
Data Protection Act, Chapter 586
Short code
Chapter 586
Jurisdiction
Malta
Enacted
2018
Last major update
Act XII of 2021 and Legal Notice 212 of 2023; Dr Reno Borg began a new five-year Information and Data Protection Commissioner term on 24 April 2026
Regulator
Information and Data Protection Commissioner (IDPC)
Private right of action
Limited

Scope, who Chapter 586 covers

Processing connected to a Malta establishment, including a Maltese embassy or high commission abroad, regardless of where processing occurs; processing by non-EU-established controllers offering goods or services to or monitoring data subjects located in Malta; and processing by non-EU controllers in places where Maltese law applies under public international law. Criminal-law processing is handled separately under S.L. 586.08.

Protected data

Personal data protected under the directly applicable GDPR and Chapter 586. Identity documents may be processed only where clearly justified by the purpose, the importance of secure identification, or another valid legal reason. National ID numbers and generally applicable identifiers require appropriate safeguards.

Data subject rights

Right to transparency and information under GDPR Article 12, subject to specified Article 23 restrictions

Right to information under Articles 13 and 14, with Malta’s Section 9 derogation limited to the listed sub-paragraphs

Right of access under Article 15, with Section 9 limited to paragraphs 15(1)-(3)

Right to rectification under Article 16, subject to research, statistics, and public-interest archiving derogations

Right to erasure under Article 17, subject to GDPR exceptions and Section 9’s limited expression derogation

Right to restriction under Article 18, subject to listed Section 9 sub-paragraphs

Right to data portability under Article 20, subject to Section 9 paragraphs 20(1)-(2)

Right to object under Article 21, with Section 9 listing paragraph 21(1) but not the direct-marketing-specific paragraphs

Right to complain to the Commissioner and challenge decisions before the Information and Data Protection Appeals Tribunal and subsequently the Court of Appeal

Notable features

Malta’s Section 9 expression derogation is unusually precise, operating at the sub-paragraph level and not creating an unrestricted deletion right for journalistic, academic, artistic, or literary material. Malta also has a distinctive territorial rule covering a Maltese embassy or high commission abroad and a public-international-law hook. The penalty framework includes a narrow public-authority-only cap separate from the general GDPR Article 83 structure.

Enforcement & penalties

Regulator: Information and Data Protection Commissioner (IDPC)

Penalties: Chapter 586 Section 20 provides the fine-imposition mechanism, while GDPR Article 83 supplies the general structure: up to €10 million or 2% of worldwide turnover for the lower tier and up to €20 million or 4% for the upper tier. A narrow Malta-specific cap applies only to public authorities or bodies: up to €25,000 per Article 83(4) violation plus possible €25 per day while ongoing, and up to €50,000 per Article 83(5) or (6) violation plus possible €50 per day. These caps do not apply to ordinary controllers or processors. Knowingly providing false information to the Commissioner or failing to comply with a lawful investigation request is a criminal offence punishable by a fine of €1,250-€50,000, imprisonment of up to 6 months, or both.

Private right of action: The GDPR Article 78(2) judicial-remedy trigger after 3 months without progress or outcome information applies, together with appeals before the Information and Data Protection Appeals Tribunal and subsequently the Court of Appeal; no separate Malta-specific general private-action route was identified.

Relevance to data brokers

No Malta-specific data-broker complaint, deletion, opt-out, or public-record-specific deletion route was located. The identified routes are ordinary GDPR rights against the relevant controller and the general IDPC complaint process. IDPC says complaints should be made through its online form with supporting documentation and controller details; anonymous complaints are not accepted. The Freedom of Information Act governs public-authority information access but is not a dedicated data-broker deletion mechanism.

Generate requests in under 60 seconds

Explore 1,034 US/global data brokers

OfflistMe helps draft opt-out requests using the details you choose. Paid one-time plans start at $9 and include 5, 50 or 500 credits (1 credit = one run that generates removal requests for all available data brokers). Review the provider route and legal basis, then send from your own inbox. The tool is not legal advice and does not guarantee a broker's response.

FAQ

Does Malta have a dedicated data-broker deletion route?+

Not located. Exercise GDPR rights against the relevant controller, including Article 17 erasure, and then use the IDPC complaint route if needed. IDPC says complaints should be made through its online form with supporting documentation and controller details; anonymous complaints are not accepted.

Does Malta’s expression derogation create an unrestricted deletion right?+

No. Section 9 may derogate from specified GDPR provisions, including parts of Article 17, where compliance would be incompatible with the expression purpose and the processing is necessary, proportionate, and justified by substantial public interest.

Is there a fixed deadline for IDPC to resolve a complaint?+

No fixed statutory deadline was located. The 3-month period under GDPR Article 78(2) is an information or judicial-remedy trigger, not a guaranteed final-decision deadline.

Official sources & citations

Other international privacy regimes

Chapter 586 sits in a global ecosystem of data-protection laws. Start with these comparative frameworks, or visit the privacy research hub for the complete jurisdiction index:

Related concepts & guides