Skip to main content
Hungary · Reviewed October 2026

What Is Act CXII of 2011 ("Info tv.") + GDPR?

Hungary's principal privacy statute is Act CXII of 2011, known as the Info tv., while the GDPR remains the primary rights source for GDPR-covered processing. The current consolidated NJT text is dated 26 August 2026 and reflects amendments through Act XVIII of 2026. The Info tv. does not wholesale incorporate its own §§14-22 into ordinary GDPR-covered processing. Instead, GDPR Articles 12-22 remain the main rights framework, with specified Hungarian provisions supplying procedural, enforcement, and penalty overlays. No general Hungarian derogation was located for those GDPR rights. NAIH provides a free notification/investigation route with a two-month statutory investigation period and a formal data-protection authority proceeding with a 150-day processing deadline. NAIH also publishes a separate Data Governance Act supervision procedure for data-intermediation services providers, including a 150-day administrative limit and possible compliance measures; this is a regulator-supervision route, not a consumer self-service deletion form.

Rahul Kandoriya
Written byRahul Kandoriya·Founder, OfflistMe·Last updated October 12, 2026

At a glance

Full name
Act CXII of 2011 ("Info tv.") + GDPR
Short code
Info tv. + GDPR
Jurisdiction
Hungary
Enacted
2011
Last major update
Current consolidated NJT text dated 26 August 2026, incorporating amendments through Act XVIII of 2026
Regulator
Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (NAIH)
Private right of action
Limited

Scope, who Info tv. + GDPR covers

GDPR-covered processing where the controller has its main or only EU establishment in Hungary, or where a controller established elsewhere offers goods or services to people in Hungary or monitors their behavior there. The Info tv. separately governs law-enforcement, national-security, and national-defense processing; purely personal or household processing is excluded.

Protected data

Personal data processed under the GDPR Articles 12-22 framework and the Info tv. supplementary provisions. Identification codes are personal data under Act XX of 1996; tax ID numbers, TAJ numbers, and personal identifiers are sector-specific codes whose use requires statutory authorization or, absent authorization, prior consent.

Data subject rights

GDPR Articles 12-22 remain the primary source of transparency, access, rectification, erasure, restriction, objection, portability, and automated-decision rights for ordinary GDPR-covered processing

Formal NAIH proceedings may seek rights compliance, correction, erasure, restriction, transfer suspension, and other GDPR measures

A free notification may be submitted to NAIH, including anonymously in some circumstances, electronically or by post

No standalone Hungarian provision was located that expressly disapplies specified Chapter III rights for journalism, academic, artistic, or literary expression

Notable features

Hungary combines directly applicable GDPR rights with a national supplementary statute whose listed provisions include NAIH procedures, enforcement, and penalties. A separate statute governs national identification codes. No standalone Hungarian expression-related Chapter III derogation was located in the reviewed Info tv. materials.

Enforcement & penalties

Regulator: Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (NAIH)

Penalties: GDPR Article 83 administrative-fine rules apply to ordinary GDPR-covered controllers and processors. Info tv. §75/A requires NAIH to exercise those powers proportionately and, for a first infringement, primarily seek remediation through a warning. The HUF 100,000-20,000,000 range applies only in limited contexts, including certain non-GDPR law-enforcement, national-security, or defense processing and GDPR fines where the liable payer is a budgetary organ; it is not a universal fine schedule for ordinary Hungarian controllers.

Private right of action: NAIH investigation and formal authority proceedings, including possible erasure and other compliance orders, are the identified mechanisms; no general private damages action was identified.

Relevance to data brokers

NAIH publishes an official Data Governance Act supervision procedure for data-intermediation services providers. The guide requires an identified provider, an alleged-infringement description, supporting facts or evidence, and an explicit remedy request; it states a 150-day administrative time limit and allows cessation, suspension, and fines in qualifying cases. This is a regulator-supervision route, not a consumer self-service opt-out or deletion form. The general GDPR and NAIH notification or formal-authority routes remain available, while public-information provisions are not a dedicated consumer deletion route for personal information in public records.

Generate requests in under 60 seconds

Explore 1,034 US/global data brokers

OfflistMe helps draft opt-out requests using the details you choose. Paid one-time plans start at $9 and include 5, 50 or 500 credits (1 credit = one run that generates removal requests for all available data brokers). Review the provider route and legal basis, then send from your own inbox. The tool is not legal advice and does not guarantee a broker's response.

FAQ

Does Hungary have a separate privacy law in addition to the GDPR?+

Yes. Act CXII of 2011, the Info tv., applies alongside the GDPR. For ordinary GDPR-covered processing, GDPR Articles 12-22 remain the primary rights source, while specified Hungarian provisions provide procedural, enforcement, and penalty overlays.

How long does NAIH have to investigate a notification?+

The statutory investigation deadline is two months from the day after notification, subject to exclusions for fact clarification, translation, and certain unavoidable disruptions. A formal authority proceeding has a separate 150-day statutory processing deadline.

Does Hungary have a dedicated data-broker deletion route?+

NAIH publishes a regulator-supervision procedure for data-intermediation services providers under the Data Governance Act. It is not a consumer self-service deletion form: the guide requires provider-identification information, an alleged-infringement description, supporting evidence, and an explicit remedy request, with a stated 150-day administrative time limit.

Official sources & citations

Other international privacy regimes

Info tv. + GDPR sits in a global ecosystem of data-protection laws. Start with these comparative frameworks, or visit the privacy research hub for the complete jurisdiction index:

Related concepts & guides