Skip to main content
Reference · 24 recorded law entries · source-checked October 12, 2026

US State Privacy Laws. Comparison Matrix

A source-linked research matrix of recorded US state privacy-law entries. It shows effective dates, response fields, regulator links, scope notes and state-guide connections. This is not legal advice or a live legal census: verify the current statute and regulator guidance before relying on a deadline, penalty, right or exemption. Read the jurisdiction coverage ledger for broader research status.

Rahul Kandoriya
Written byRahul Kandoriya·Founder, OfflistMe·Last updated October 12, 2026

Comprehensive state privacy laws

These 24 state entries are flagged as comprehensive-law records in the current research dataset. Rights, thresholds, exemptions, response windows and enforcement routes differ by state and request type.

StateLawEffectiveResponseGeneral PRASourceGuide
CaliforniaCCPA/CPRA2020-01-0145dNot identifiedCalifornia Privacy Protection AgencyView →
VirginiaVCDPA2023-01-0145dNot identifiedVirginia Office of the Attorney GeneralView →
ColoradoCPA2023-07-0145dNot identifiedColorado Attorney GeneralView →
ConnecticutCTDPA2023-07-0145dNot identifiedConnecticut Attorney GeneralView →
UtahUCPA2023-12-3145dNot identifiedUtah Attorney GeneralView →
TexasTDPSA2024-07-0145dNot identifiedTexas Attorney General. Consumer Protection DivisionView →
FloridaFDBR2024-07-0145dNot identifiedFlorida Department of Legal AffairsView →
OregonOCPA2024-07-0145dNot identifiedOregon Department of Justice. Consumer ProtectionView →
MontanaMTCDPA2024-10-0145dNot identifiedMontana Office of Consumer ProtectionView →
DelawareDPDPA2025-01-0145dNot identifiedDelaware Department of Justice. Consumer ProtectionView →
New HampshireNHDPA2025-01-0145dNot identifiedNew Hampshire Department of Justice. Consumer ProtectionView →
IowaICDPA2025-01-0190dNot identifiedIowa Attorney General. Consumer Protection DivisionView →
NebraskaNBDPA2025-01-0145dNot identifiedNebraska Attorney GeneralView →
New JerseyNJDPA2025-01-1545dNot identifiedNew Jersey Attorney General. Division of Consumer AffairsView →
TennesseeTIPA2025-07-0145dNot identifiedTennessee Attorney General. Consumer ProtectionView →
MinnesotaMCDPA2025-07-3145dNot identifiedMinnesota Attorney GeneralView →
MarylandMODPA2025-10-0145dNot identifiedMaryland Office of the Attorney GeneralView →
IndianaINCDPA2026-01-0145dNot identifiedIndiana Attorney General. Consumer ProtectionView →
KentuckyKCDPA2026-01-0145dNot identifiedKentucky Office of the Attorney GeneralView →
Rhode IslandRIDTPPA2026-01-0145dNot identifiedRhode Island Office of the Attorney GeneralView →
LouisianaLa. SB 386 (2026)2027-01-01dNot identifiedLouisiana Department of Justice. Public Protection DivisionView →
OklahomaOkla. SB 546 (2026)2027-01-01dNot identifiedOklahoma Office of the Attorney GeneralView →
AlabamaAla. Code tit. 8, ch. 44 (Act 2026-552)2027-05-01dNot identifiedAlabama Attorney General. Consumer ProtectionView →
VermontVt. S.71 (2026)2028-01-01dNot identifiedVermont Office of the Attorney General. Consumer Assistance ProgramView →

PRA = Private Right of Action. This matrix does not identify a general PRA in any of its recorded comprehensive-law entries. Separate statutes may create narrower rights—for example, Illinois BIPA for biometric data, California CCPA for certain data-breach claims, and Washington MHMDA through the Consumer Protection Act for covered consumer-health-data practices. Verify the controlling statute and current guidance for the specific claim.

Dive deeper into each law

Each explainer walks through scope, covered data, consumer rights, penalties, enforcement history, and the practical implications for removing your data from brokers. Written in plain English, cited to the statute.

States without comprehensive laws

These 26 state entries do not have a comprehensive law recorded in this snapshot. Residents may still have broker-policy, sector-law or consumer-protection routes; CCPA rights do not automatically transfer to every requester.

Key concepts

Response deadline

The time a business has to respond to a request under the applicable law. Many laws use periods around 45 days, but the exact clock, extension, request type and exemption vary.

Cure period

A grace period during which a business may remedy a violation before enforcement. California sunset its general cure period in 2023; Colorado sunset its general cure period January 1, 2025, but a limited 60-day notice-and-cure rule for specified minor-data provisions remains through December 31, 2026. Connecticut sunset its general cure period December 31, 2024. Texas, Indiana, Kentucky, and Tennessee still have broader cure provisions.

Universal opt-out mechanism

Browser-level opt-out signals like Global Privacy Control (GPC). Recognition and controller scope vary by state, regulation, signal and processing purpose; GPC does not itself erase historical broker profiles.

Private right of action

The ability to sue directly rather than relying on AG enforcement. None of the comprehensive state privacy laws grant a general PRA. Illinois BIPA (biometric), California CCPA (breaches), and Washington MHMDA (health) offer narrow PRAs.

Notable distinguishing features by law

California (CCPA/CPRA)

Has a dedicated privacy agency and public data-broker registry. California materials describe a Delete Act mechanism; verify the current portal, covered scope and processing rules.

Maryland (MODPA)

Contains distinctive sensitive-data, minimization and under-18 consent provisions. Compare the current statute for thresholds, exemptions, response rules and discretionary cure notice.

Minnesota (MCDPA)

Includes specific rights to question profiling results, review data used in a significant decision, and seek correction and reevaluation when the data is inaccurate.

New Jersey (NJDPA + Daniel's Law)

Daniel's Law has separate rules for covered private-internet disclosures, including a 72-hour removal rule and a distinct 10-business-day notice/non-posting rule under applicable provisions; the OIP government-site process and coverage are distinct from NJDPA.

Tennessee (TIPA)

Provides a conditional affirmative defense for a written privacy program that reasonably conforms to the NIST Privacy Framework or a comparable framework.

Nebraska (NBDPA)

Uses a non-small-business and processing/sale test instead of consumer-count thresholds; the Nebraska product/service connection and statutory exclusions still apply.

Oregon (OCPA)

Nonprofit entities are within scope from July 1, 2025, subject to statutory exemptions.

Iowa (ICDPA)

Lists access, deletion of personal data provided by the consumer, portability and sale opt-out rights; it does not list correction or profiling opt-out rights and uses a 90-day response framework.

Rhode Island (RIDTPPA)

For covered for-profit entities, the chapter adds customer rights and requires certain commercial websites or ISPs that collect, store, and sell personal information to identify data categories, relevant third parties, and a contact method in specified notices.

Generate requests in under 60 seconds

Explore 1,034 US/global data brokers

OfflistMe can prepare user-reviewed request drafts for selected catalog routes. Paid one-time plans have fixed request quotas. Verify the current law and wording for your state, then send or submit each request yourself.

FAQ: US privacy laws

How many US states have comprehensive consumer privacy laws?+

This matrix currently contains 24 state entries flagged as comprehensive-law records in OfflistMe's research dataset. That count is not a live legal census: enactment, effective dates, amendments, scope and definitions must be checked against the current official statute and regulator.

What is the strictest US state privacy law?+

There is no objective single strictest law for every use case. States differ across sensitive-data rules, thresholds, universal opt-out treatment, enforcement, cure periods and exemptions; compare the current statute for the issue you need to resolve.

Which states have a private right of action for privacy violations?+

Private enforcement rights are statute- and sector-specific. This matrix does not provide an exhaustive private-right-of-action census; check the controlling statute and current court or regulator guidance before assuming that a claim is available.

Do I need to be a resident of a state to use its privacy law?+

A state privacy law generally defines its own resident and controller scope, but eligibility also depends on the business, data, request type and exemptions. Some brokers publish nationwide workflows, while others vary verification and response practices; do not assume one state law applies to every requester.

What is a "cure period" and which states still have one?+

A cure period is a statutory grace period during which a business may remedy a violation before an enforcement action. Whether one exists, its duration and its effect can change by statute, amendment, violation and date; verify the current law rather than relying on a general list.

Related concepts & guides