What Is the Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)?
TIPA applies to controllers and processors meeting the statute's business, revenue, and consumer-data thresholds, subject to exemptions. Rights include delete, access, correct, port, and opt-out of targeted advertising, certain profiling, and sale. A qualifying written privacy program may support an affirmative defense; enforcement is exclusive to the AG, and the 60-day notice-and-cure process and penalty rules apply only under their statutory conditions.
At a glance
- Full name
- Tennessee Information Protection Act
- Short code
- TIPA
- Effective date
- July 1, 2025
- Response reference
- 45 days in this snapshot
- Cure period
- 60 days in this snapshot
- Private right of action
- No
- Enforcement
- Tennessee Attorney General. Consumer Protection Division
- Penalty reference
- Up to $7,500 per violation; a court may award treble damages for willful or knowing violations
- Statutory citation
- Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 47-18-3301–47-18-3315
Who TIPA applies to
A business is covered if it meets the applicability thresholds set out in Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 47-18-3301–47-18-3315. The thresholds listed below are the research record for this law. Whether one or more applies depends on the current statute, its exceptions, and the business's facts; do not assume a universal threshold structure.
- Does business in Tennessee or targets Tennessee residents, exceeds $25 million in annual revenue, and controls or processes the personal data of at least 175,000 Tennessee consumers during a calendar year
- Does business in Tennessee or targets Tennessee residents, exceeds $25 million in annual revenue, controls or processes the personal data of at least 25,000 Tennessee consumers, and derives more than 50% of gross annual revenue from the sale of personal data
Consumer rights under TIPA
Delete, access, correct, port, opt-out
Conditional NIST or comparable-framework affirmative defense
Up to $7,500 per violation; treble damages may be available for willful or knowing violations
Notable features (vs. CCPA)
TIPA gives covered consumers access, correction, deletion, portability, and opt-out rights for targeted advertising, certain profiling, and sale, with a 45-day response framework. A 2026 amendment effective July 1, 2026 expands the statutory definition of biometric data by removing the prior exclusion for data generated from photographs, video, or audio recordings. TIPA also offers a conditional affirmative defense when a controller or processor maintains and follows a written privacy policy that meets the statute's NIST or comparable-framework requirements; that defense does not eliminate other obligations or guarantee an enforcement result.
Enforcement and penalty reference
Enforcing agency: Tennessee Attorney General. Consumer Protection Division
Penalty reference: Up to $7,500 per violation; a court may award treble damages for willful or knowing violations
Cure period: Before bringing an action, the Attorney General must provide written notice and allow a 60-day cure period under the conditions in the statute. A cure and express written statement do not create automatic immunity if a subsequent violation occurs or the prior violation persists.
Private right of action: TIPA has no private right of action. The Tennessee Attorney General has exclusive enforcement authority.
Where to file a complaint: Tennessee Attorney General. Consumer Protection
How to exercise your TIPA rights
- 1
Identify the business that holds your data. OfflistMe can help you review a provider route across 1,034 US/global data brokers in the 1,052-record research universe; it does not decide whether a law applies to a specific request.
- 2
Submit a verifiable consumer request. Submit a request to the business's designated contact using the provider's current verification instructions. Include only the information reasonably needed to match your record and check the applicable Tennessee residency, scope, exemption, and verification rules before sending.
- 3
Track the applicable response window. This research snapshot records a 45-day reference window for the modeled request. Confirm the current statute, request type, controller scope, extension rule, and verification date before treating it as a deadline.
- 4
Escalate if denied or ignored. If the provider does not respond or disputes the request, preserve the request and response record, review the applicable exceptions, and consider the Tennessee Attorney General. Consumer Protection complaint route at https://www.tn.gov/attorneygeneral/working-for-tennessee/consumer/file-a-complaint.html. A complaint route does not itself guarantee deletion or a particular enforcement result.
Generate requests in under 60 seconds
Generate your TIPA privacy request, $9 one-time
FAQ
What is the NIST Privacy Framework affirmative defense?+
TIPA allows a controller to raise an affirmative defense when the statutory conditions for a written privacy program reasonably conforming to the NIST Privacy Framework or a comparable framework are met. The defense is fact-specific and does not guarantee that the AG will not investigate or enforce.
How long does TIPA give a controller to answer a consumer request?+
TIPA uses a 45-day response framework and permits an additional 45 days when reasonably necessary and the consumer is notified. The request type, authentication, statutory exceptions, and the controller's applicable process still matter.
Official sources & citations
Compare with sibling state laws
TIPA is one of 18 comprehensive US state privacy laws. Its closest peers by effective date, useful when tracking how this law influenced or was influenced by neighboring legislation:
State privacy-law comparison: effective dates, cure periods, and penalties
18 explainer states are compared from the state-law datasets. The chart emphasizes cure-period days; the table preserves effective dates and penalty wording.
- Highlighted state
- Other states with an explainer
Effective: 2024-07-01
Penalty: Up to $7,500 per violation
Effective: 2023-01-01
Penalty: Up to $7,500 per violation
Effective: 2023-07-01
Penalty: Up to $20,000 per violation under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act
Effective: 2023-07-01
Penalty: Up to $5,000 per violation under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act
Effective: 2023-12-31
Penalty: Up to $7,500 per violation
Effective: 2024-07-01
Penalty: Up to $7,500 per violation under the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act
Effective: 2025-07-01
Penalty: Up to $7,500 per violation; a court may award treble damages for willful or knowing violations
Effective: 2025-01-01
Penalty: Up to $10,000 per violation under the Delaware Consumer Fraud Act
Effective: 2025-01-01
Penalty: Up to $10,000 per violation under RSA 358-A:4
Effective: 2025-01-15
Penalty: Up to $10,000 for the first violation; up to $20,000 for each subsequent violation under the NJ Consumer Fraud Act
Effective: 2025-10-01
Penalty: Up to $10,000 per violation; up to $25,000 for repeat violations under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act
Effective: 2025-07-31
Penalty: Up to $7,500 per violation under existing consumer protection authority
Effective: 2025-01-01
Penalty: Up to $7,500 per violation under the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act
Effective: 2024-10-01
Penalty: Up to $7,500 for each violation under Mont. Code Ann. § 30-14-2820, following the statutory notice-and-cure period
Effective: 2026-01-01
Penalty: Up to $7,500 for each violation under Ind. Code § 24-15-10-2, plus reasonable enforcement expenses
Effective: 2025-01-01
Penalty: Up to $7,500 in civil penalties for each violation under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-1124, following the statutory cure period or a breach of the written statement
Effective: 2026-01-01
Penalty: Up to $7,500 in damages for each continued violation under Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.3627
Effective: 2026-01-01
Penalty: An intentional disclosure to a shell entity or in violation of the chapter carries a $100–$500 fine per disclosure under R.I. Gen. Laws § 6-48.1-8; other Deceptive Trade Practices Act remedies are not summarized here
“None” follows the explainer's null cure-period field; it is not an inference about a different provision. Effective dates are “Not stated” when the matching state-page field is absent.
Show the data as a table
| State | Effective date | Cure period | Penalty text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 2024-07-01 | 30 days | Up to $7,500 per violation |
| Virginia | 2023-01-01 | 30 days | Up to $7,500 per violation |
| Colorado | 2023-07-01 | none | Up to $20,000 per violation under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act |
| Connecticut | 2023-07-01 | none | Up to $5,000 per violation under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act |
| Utah | 2023-12-31 | 30 days | Up to $7,500 per violation |
| Oregon | 2024-07-01 | none | Up to $7,500 per violation under the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act |
| Tennessee | 2025-07-01 | 60 days | Up to $7,500 per violation; a court may award treble damages for willful or knowing violations |
| Delaware | 2025-01-01 | none | Up to $10,000 per violation under the Delaware Consumer Fraud Act |
| New Hampshire | 2025-01-01 | none | Up to $10,000 per violation under RSA 358-A:4 |
| New Jersey | 2025-01-15 | none | Up to $10,000 for the first violation; up to $20,000 for each subsequent violation under the NJ Consumer Fraud Act |
| Maryland | 2025-10-01 | none | Up to $10,000 per violation; up to $25,000 for repeat violations under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act |
| Minnesota | 2025-07-31 | none | Up to $7,500 per violation under existing consumer protection authority |
| Iowa | 2025-01-01 | 90 days | Up to $7,500 per violation under the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act |
| Montana | 2024-10-01 | 30 days | Up to $7,500 for each violation under Mont. Code Ann. § 30-14-2820, following the statutory notice-and-cure period |
| Indiana | 2026-01-01 | 30 days | Up to $7,500 for each violation under Ind. Code § 24-15-10-2, plus reasonable enforcement expenses |
| Nebraska | 2025-01-01 | 30 days | Up to $7,500 in civil penalties for each violation under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-1124, following the statutory cure period or a breach of the written statement |
| Kentucky | 2026-01-01 | 30 days | Up to $7,500 in damages for each continued violation under Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.3627 |
| Rhode Island | 2026-01-01 | none | An intentional disclosure to a shell entity or in violation of the chapter carries a $100–$500 fine per disclosure under R.I. Gen. Laws § 6-48.1-8; other Deceptive Trade Practices Act remedies are not summarized here |
Sources (36)
Texas Business & Commerce Code, Chapter 541 (TDPSA) · Texas AG. Consumer Privacy · Virginia Code § 59.1-575 (VCDPA) · Virginia AG. Consumer Privacy · Colorado Revised Statutes 2026, Title 6, Part 13 (Colorado Privacy Act) · Colorado AG. Data Privacy · Connecticut Attorney General. The Connecticut Data Privacy Act · Connecticut Public Act 25-113 · Utah Code Title 13, Chapter 61 (UCPA) · Utah Code § 13-61-201, effective July 1, 2026 · Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 646A (2025 edition; check later session laws) · Oregon Legislature. Current ORS update and session-law notice · Tennessee Code, Title 47, Chapter 18, Part 33 (official code volume) · Tennessee Attorney General. TIPA consumer and business guide · Delaware Code Title 6, Chapter 12D (DPDPA) · Delaware DOJ. Consumer Protection · New Hampshire Revised Statutes, Chapter 507-H (NHDPA) · New Hampshire Revised Statutes § 358-A:4 · NJDPA (P.L. 2023, c. 266. Full Text) · New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs · Maryland SB 541 / MODPA (Signed Chapter 455) · Maryland AG. Consumer Protection Division · Minnesota Statutes Chapter 325M (MCDPA) · Minnesota AG. Consumer Protection · Iowa Code Chapter 715D (ICDPA) · Iowa AG. Consumer Protection · Montana Code Title 30, Chapter 14, Part 28 (MTCDPA) · Montana DOJ. Montana Consumer Data Privacy / SB 297 · Indiana Code Title 24, Article 15 (INCDPA) · Indiana Attorney General. Consumer Data Bill of Rights · Nebraska Revised Statutes §§ 87-1101–87-1130 (NBDPA) · Nebraska Revised Statute § 87-1103 (applicability) · Kentucky Revised Statutes Chapter 367 (KCDPA sections) · Kentucky Revised Statutes § 367.3611 (July 1, 2027 version) · Rhode Island General Laws Title 6, Chapter 48.1 (RIDTPPA) · Rhode Island General Laws § 6-48.1-3 (information sharing practices)
Checked state pages 2026-10-14; law explainers 2026-10-11
Recorded state response-window references
The bars show deletionDeadlineDays values recorded in the state-page dataset; states without that field remain visible in a separate list.
- Highlighted focus state
- Other recorded states
This is a reference window recorded in this dataset; confirm the statute, request type, controller scope, verification rules, extensions, and exceptions before treating it as a deadline. A recorded window does not predict acceptance or completion.
Not recorded: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.
Show the data as a table
| State | Reference window | Dataset status |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Not recorded | Context |
| Alaska | Not recorded | Context |
| Arizona | Not recorded | Context |
| Arkansas | Not recorded | Context |
| California | 45 days | Context |
| Colorado | 45 days | Context |
| Connecticut | 45 days | Context |
| Delaware | 45 days | Context |
| Florida | 45 days | Context |
| Georgia | Not recorded | Context |
| Hawaii | Not recorded | Context |
| Idaho | Not recorded | Context |
| Illinois | Not recorded | Context |
| Indiana | 45 days | Context |
| Iowa | 90 days | Context |
| Kansas | Not recorded | Context |
| Kentucky | 45 days | Context |
| Louisiana | Not recorded | Context |
| Maine | Not recorded | Context |
| Maryland | 45 days | Context |
| Massachusetts | Not recorded | Context |
| Michigan | Not recorded | Context |
| Minnesota | 45 days | Context |
| Mississippi | Not recorded | Context |
| Missouri | Not recorded | Context |
| Montana | 45 days | Context |
| Nebraska | 45 days | Context |
| Nevada | Not recorded | Context |
| New Hampshire | 45 days | Context |
| New Jersey | 45 days | Context |
| New Mexico | Not recorded | Context |
| New York | Not recorded | Context |
| North Carolina | Not recorded | Context |
| North Dakota | Not recorded | Context |
| Ohio | Not recorded | Context |
| Oklahoma | Not recorded | Context |
| Oregon | 45 days | Context |
| Pennsylvania | Not recorded | Context |
| Rhode Island | 45 days | Context |
| South Carolina | Not recorded | Context |
| South Dakota | Not recorded | Context |
| Tennessee | 45 days | Focus state |
| Texas | 45 days | Context |
| Utah | 45 days | Context |
| Vermont | Not recorded | Context |
| Virginia | 45 days | Context |
| Washington | Not recorded | Context |
| West Virginia | Not recorded | Context |
| Wisconsin | Not recorded | Context |
| Wyoming | Not recorded | Context |
Sources (50)
California attorney-general source · Texas attorney-general source · Florida attorney-general source · New York attorney-general source · Virginia attorney-general source · Colorado attorney-general source · Illinois attorney-general source · Washington attorney-general source · Connecticut attorney-general source · Oregon attorney-general source · Utah attorney-general source · Pennsylvania attorney-general source · Ohio attorney-general source · Georgia attorney-general source · Massachusetts attorney-general source · New Jersey attorney-general source · Minnesota attorney-general source · Tennessee attorney-general source · Maryland attorney-general source · Delaware attorney-general source · New Hampshire attorney-general source · Indiana attorney-general source · Iowa attorney-general source · Montana attorney-general source · Nebraska attorney-general source · Kentucky attorney-general source · Rhode Island attorney-general source · Arizona attorney-general source · North Carolina attorney-general source · Michigan attorney-general source · Nevada attorney-general source · Vermont attorney-general source · Wisconsin attorney-general source · Missouri attorney-general source · Alabama attorney-general source · South Carolina attorney-general source · Louisiana attorney-general source · Oklahoma attorney-general source · Kansas attorney-general source · Mississippi attorney-general source · Arkansas attorney-general source · West Virginia attorney-general source · Maine attorney-general source · New Mexico attorney-general source · Idaho attorney-general source · Hawaii attorney-general source · Alaska attorney-general source · North Dakota attorney-general source · South Dakota attorney-general source · Wyoming attorney-general source
Checked state pages 2026-10-14