How to Request Removal of an AWDTSG Facebook-Group Post (2026)
How to preserve evidence and request removal of an Are We Dating The Same Guy Facebook-group post, with separate guidance for reporting, copyright, threats, and copies.
Someone sends you a screenshot from an “Are We Dating the Same Guy?” (AWDTSG) group. It may show your name, photo, city, occupation, messages, or allegations about a date or relationship. The group may be private, but private does not mean that every member keeps content confidential: a member can screenshot or repeat information elsewhere.
This guide focuses on evidence, platform reporting, copyright boundaries, and safety. It does not decide whether a statement is defamatory, promise that Meta will remove a post, or suggest that a person join a group or confront its members to investigate. If there is a threat, stalking, intimate-image abuse, blackmail, or immediate danger, preserve the evidence and use qualified local support or emergency services.
Quick answer
- Save the screenshot, post URL if available, group name, account name, date, and exact text. Ask the person who saw it to preserve evidence without forwarding it widely.
- Do not argue in the thread or contact unknown members from an account that could expose more personal information.
- Report the post, comment, image, or message through the current Facebook/Meta reporting flow and, where appropriate, to group administrators. Meta says reported content is reviewed under its current Community Standards and may have a request-for-review route.
- Use a copyright report only when you own or are authorized to enforce the copyright in the specific image or work and the use is actually a copyright issue. A photo of you is not automatically copyrighted by you.
- For false factual claims, private information, threats, or intimate material, preserve the exact wording and seek qualified legal or safety advice. Those issues have different legal tests and platform routes.
- If a screenshot appears on another platform or in Google Search, report that copy separately. A Facebook action does not control an independent copy.
What an AWDTSG post may contain
The same post can combine several different categories:
- a photograph or dating-profile image;
- a name, city, employer, or public professional detail;
- private messages or screenshots;
- a personal account of a date;
- an opinion or warning;
- a factual allegation that may be true, false, or impossible to verify; or
- a phone number, address, intimate image, threat, or other sensitive information.
The removal route depends on the actual item. Copyright is about protected expression and ownership. Privacy reporting is about the platform's policy and the circumstances. Defamation concerns false statements of fact and jurisdiction-specific elements. A safety report concerns threats, stalking, harassment, or physical risk. Do not use one label for every problem.
Tired of dealing with data exposure?
Choose relevant provider workflows, review the generated drafts in your browser, and send or submit each request yourself. Matching, eligibility, and provider requirements still need checking.
Preserve evidence safely
Before reporting, create a private evidence record:
| Evidence | Record |
|---|---|
| Source | Facebook group, page, profile, or external platform |
| Exact location | Post, comment, image, message, or URL |
| Date | When you saw it and when the screenshot was taken |
| Content | Exact words, image, threat, phone number, or address shown |
| Context | What appears before and after the statement |
| Spread | Known reposts, messages, or external URLs |
| Action | Report, admin request, legal consultation, safety response |
| Result | Pending, removed, denied, copied elsewhere, or unknown |
Store evidence securely. Redact or limit personal details before sharing it with an employer, family member, advocate, or lawyer. Do not post the screenshot publicly to ask strangers for help; that can increase its distribution.
If someone else saw the post, ask them for the exact URL and a private screenshot rather than a public repost. A group member may be able to see information that is unavailable to you, but do not ask them to break a platform rule or expose their identity unnecessarily.
Report the content through Meta
Facebook's current interface can vary by device, region, account, and content type. Use the menu attached to the exact post, comment, image, or message and select the closest current category. A typical flow may include:
- Open the post or comment through a trusted link or the reporting person's account.
- Use the menu for the item and choose the current report option.
- Describe the specific issue: personal information, threat, harassment, privacy, intimate content, impersonation, or another category that fits.
- Include the exact context and URL where the form allows it.
- Check Facebook's Support Inbox for the report notification and status, and use "Request another review" when Meta offers that option.
Meta's help material says it can hide or remove content when it violates its Community Standards and may offer another review after a report is denied. The result is policy-specific; multiple reports do not prove that content violates a policy and should not be used to coordinate abuse or false reporting.
You can also ask a group administrator to review the post, but an administrator may decline, may not control screenshots, and may not be neutral. Use a written, factual request if contacting an administrator is safe. Do not threaten members, impersonate someone, or enter a group with a false identity to obtain more content.
When a copyright report may fit
Copyright can be relevant when someone copied a photograph, video, writing, or other protected work without permission. The copyright owner is often the person who created the work, not necessarily the person depicted. A selfie may be owned by the person who took it, but a photograph taken by a friend, professional photographer, dating-app photographer, or another person may belong to that creator unless rights were transferred or another rule applies.
Before filing, confirm:
- what work is allegedly copied;
- who owns or controls the copyright;
- where the original work was published;
- where the allegedly infringing copy appears; and
- whether an exception, license, permission, fair use, or other defense may matter.
Use Facebook's current Copyright Help reporting form to file an original infringement report, and read the required statements, contact-information disclosure, and counter-notice consequences. Keep this separate from Meta's appeal/DMCA counter-notification page, which is for content that was already removed after a copyright report, not for filing a new one. Do not file a copyright claim simply because a post is embarrassing or uses your likeness. A copyright report may address the image while leaving text, comments, or a separate screenshot unresolved.
If you are unsure whether you own the image or whether the use is infringing, ask a qualified copyright professional. A knowingly inaccurate legal notice can create risk, and the reporter's contact details may be shared as part of the process.
Privacy, harassment, and sensitive-information reports
If the post includes a home address, personal phone, private messages, intimate images, threats, impersonation, or targeted harassment, use the current Meta category that describes the actual content. State what is exposed and why it is private or dangerous. Do not add unnecessary details about a survivor, child, medical issue, or dating history.
Meta's decision is not a legal finding. A post may remain because it does not meet a platform policy even if you believe it violates a law, and it may be removed under a policy without proving a legal claim. Save the decision and use any available review route.
If the content is a private or intimate image shared without consent, use the platform's current intimate-image reporting path and consider qualified support. If the content contains a Social Security number, financial account, or exact address, treat the information as a separate privacy and identity-safety issue and review the relevant source copies.
Defamation and other legal questions
A negative opinion is not automatically defamatory, and a statement that looks like an opinion can still imply verifiable facts in context. A defamation claim generally depends on the jurisdiction, the statement, whether it is false and factual, publication, fault, harm, privileges, and other elements. There is no universal “false post equals lawsuit” rule.
Section 230 and platform liability questions are also fact- and jurisdiction-specific. Do not tell a reader that a group admin or platform is automatically immune or automatically liable. An attorney can evaluate the poster, administrator, platform, identity-disclosure options, deadlines, and available remedies. Preserve the original wording before asking for a correction or deletion.
Federal law may apply to a pattern of conduct in some cases, including certain interstate stalking or cyberstalking facts under 18 U.S.C. § 2261A, but the statute's elements and jurisdiction matter. State harassment, stalking, privacy, image-based-abuse, and defamation laws vary; see the state-by-state data-removal index for the broker-removal side of this (it does not cover AWDTSG-specific harassment or defamation statutes). Do not use this guide as a substitute for legal advice.
If the screenshot spreads elsewhere
Treat each copy as a separate source:
- use Reddit's current privacy or personal-information report for a Reddit copy;
- use TikTok's current privacy or personal-information route for a TikTok copy;
- use X's current private-information, harassment, or copyright route for an X copy;
- ask a website owner or forum administrator to remove a copied page when safe;
- use Google's current personal-information removal guidance for eligible Search results; and
- use an outdated-content or refresh route only when a source page changed or the live criteria fit.
Search removal does not remove the source page. A Facebook report does not remove a screenshot on another service. Record each URL, report, response, and later re-check.
Safety and account boundaries
If the post is connected to an active threat:
- Move to a safe device and account if the abuser or harasser may monitor your accounts.
- Tell a trusted person or qualified advocate what is happening.
- Consider law-enforcement or emergency support when there is an immediate danger.
- Review account recovery, location sharing, dating-app visibility, phone-number discovery, and public address exposure.
- Do not confront the poster if doing so could escalate the risk.
The goal is to preserve control and reduce further spread, not to win an online argument. A platform removal cannot undo a screenshot already downloaded by another person.
OfflistMe workflow boundary
OfflistMe is not a Facebook reporting service and does not remove posts from private groups, search engines, or social platforms. Its browser-local provider workflows may help with separate public data-broker listings when a matching source is verified. The user reviews any draft, sends or submits it, completes the provider's process, and keeps the response. No data-broker request substitutes for a Meta report, copyright analysis, safety response, or legal advice.
Frequently asked questions
Can I force an AWDTSG group to remove a post?
You can request review from the group admin or Meta, but neither route guarantees removal. The applicable platform policy, content, evidence, group settings, and response determine what happens.
Can I use a DMCA notice because my photo is embarrassing?
Only when you own or are authorized to enforce the copyright in the work and the use is a copyright issue. Being depicted in a photo does not automatically make you the copyright owner.
How long does Meta take to remove a report?
Do not rely on a 24–72-hour promise. Meta's current help material describes review and possible re-review, but timing and outcome vary by report type, volume, region, and additional analysis.
Will removing the Facebook post remove screenshots?
No. A screenshot, repost, message, or search result is a separate copy and needs its own report or source request.
Should I comment to correct the story?
Usually avoid public escalation while you preserve evidence and obtain advice. A reply may create more notifications or screenshots. If you need to correct a factual record, ask a qualified adviser about the safest channel.
Sources
- Facebook Help: report a group to Facebook
- Facebook Help: why reported content may remain and review options
- Facebook Help: Copyright Help reporting form
- Facebook Help: copyright appeal/counter-notification information
- Facebook Help: private group visibility — confirm the current destination before relying on this link, as it may redirect
- Google: remove private information from Search
- 18 U.S.C. § 2261A
Reviewed August 26, 2026. Verify the current Meta interface, policy category, copyright form, and local legal route before submitting a report or legal notice.
Related guides
Understand your privacy rights
Where a privacy right is relevant, these plain-English explainers show what each law covers and what to verify before making a request.
Related Data Broker Removal Guides
Take back your privacy today
Review provider-specific routes, prepare your requests locally, and send or submit each one yourself.
Review Provider RoutesFree to review provider routes · Optional one-time unlock from $9.00 · No subscription
